Archive | News & Events RSS feed for this section

Sugar and the Alternatives: Low-sugar vs no added sugar vs white grape juice; beet sugar vs. cane sugar

Dorothy at HeathGlen

Dorothy at HeathGlen

At the markets and events where I sample jams, I find myself  responding to questions about sugar more than any other issue.  Five to ten years ago the questions focused on whether the product was organic, whether it had artificial preservatives in it, whether it was made in the US, and if all the alcohol was burned off.  Today it is:  “What kind of sugar do you use?  What is the carb count, and Can diabetics eat this?”

Because of the high number of diabetics in the states now and the obesity rate, many people have been bombarded with information about sugar.  Much of this information is questionable, and in my mind, some of the labeling implications can actually be harmful to diabetics.  The “no-sugar added” tag on the label for instance.  Very often that means the manufacturer is substituting white grape juice for pure cane sugar.  Not only does white grape juice mute the flavor of the fresh fruit and allow for less of the volume of the product to be fresh fruit and more to be inexpensive grape juice, but the travesty is that white grape juice is no better for the diabetic than pure cane sugar.  In essence, “less” sugar is not really used, but rather “different” sugar.

My jams are low sugar jams for one reason only…..taste.  I do not promote them as a health alternative, although I do believe that there is nothing unhealthy about using a spoonful of low-sugar jam in your morning yogurt, oatmeal or toast.  I believe it’s all about the fruit.  Take a jam with more fruit than sugar, using organic fresh fruit, and one that hasn’t had the nutrients boiled into oblivion and you don’t need very much of it to satisfy yourself for the day.  (Another post will cover the “boiled into oblivion” idea where you are afraid to use a natural pectin product because your grandmother didn’t.  It’s all about which fruit you use)

So sugar.  This is what I have learned about sugar in working with it in the jams for the past 14 years:

Refined Sugar (Beet sugar vs. Cane Sugar)

When  talking about refined sugar, “nutrition” is not what we’re talking about.  The nutritional aspect of the food you’re eating that contains sugar is better looked at by how much of  the sugar you’re eating.  The amount of sugar we consume should be in such small amounts that the nutrition of the ingredient itself doesn’t matter.

Beet sugar and Cane sugar are both refined and processed products.  Chefs tend to like cane sugar more because it caramelizes better and in some things like brulees you can tell the difference in these two sugars.  Professional bakers also seem to prefer cane sugar due to the behavior of beet sugar in baking (apparently it gives a coarser texture in some things).  For most cooking purposes you can’t tell the difference in texture or taste, and for the home cook it is very difficult to know which one you are getting from the store, as the label doesn’t distinguish which one in most cases.  You pretty much have to know which brand is beet or cane and then buy by the brand name.  I use beet sugar because the Crystal brand is a beet sugar that is grown in Minnesota and I try to stay as local as possible.  Labeling law doesn’t require a cane or beet designation. C & H is the only mass-market producer to do so; other refiners decline.

The biggest difference between cane and beet sugar is in the brown sugar product and how it is processed.   Brown cane sugar is a combination of sugar and molasses, both of which exist in the sugarcane plant .  It is produced in one step, as part of the natural refining process (crystallization).  Beet sugar is processed differently.  The molasses is stripped off of the sugar granules because beet molasses is not fit for human consumption.  Cane molasses is then added back in to the beet sugar by coating (or painting, as it is called) the beet granules with the molasses.  Because the molasses is not an inherent part of the sugar, it can sometimes by rubbed right off.  Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1999/03/31/FD91867.DTL&ao=all#ixzz1oRTBTwiZ

It is true that 99.95 percent of both beet sugar and cane sugar is sucrose.  The remaining .05 percent is made up of trace minerals and proteins, which can have an effect.  Remember that beets are a root, growing below ground and cane is a grass that grows above ground.  This variation might mean something in the mineral make up of the soil in which they grow.  I do not have any researched information on the difference that this makes, but being an organic farmer I know that trace minerals in the soil can be pretty important in some cases.  Some people have also told me they will not use beet sugar due to the way it is grown, and some people don’t want to use cane sugar due to the way it is harvested.  This is all anecdotal information however, and if you know of any specific studies relating to this please leave a comment.

Refined sugar by other Names:

A lot of manufacturers are using the word “crystals” in describing the sugar in their products.  Some of these names include: cane juice crystals, dehydrated cane juice crystals, unrefined cane juice crystals, raw cane crystals, washed cane juice crystals, Florida crystals (a trademarked name), unbleached evaporated sugar cane juice crystals, crystallized cane juice, and unbleached crystallized evaporated cane juice.

Organicanews.com had a fairly comprehensive article on sugar called “On the Sweet-Tooth of a Dilemma “, and they include several interviews on the subject.  The following quote is from Vimlan VanDien, a nutritionist at the respected Bastyr University, in Seattle, Washington:   “One hundred grams of dried cane juice is pretty much the same thing as 100 grams of other sweeteners, no matter what you call it.  When people call these sugars something other than sugar, it’s deceptive in a way—if the market is uninformed. Because dehydrated cane juice is sugar. It simply sounds like a whole food.  But it’s not whole food. If you wanted the whole food, you’d go out in the field and eat the sugar cane, and get all the fiber and nutrients it has.”

The nutritionist’s advice for consumers is, ” …look at the package to see if it tells how many grams of sugar are in the product.” That is one sure guide to controlling your sugar intake.

What about fruit juice and artificially sweetened products?

VanDien isn’t much more fond of concentrated fruit juice sweeteners. “Some of them are nothing more than refined white grape juice, with no fiber, and no complex carbohydrates. You might as well be eating sugar,” VanDien says. “Generally, when you see fruit juice sweetened, it’s not necessarily better than sugar.”

The question for me is how much fruit is in your jam or preserve relative to how much sweetener it contains. In a jam sweetened with fruit juice concentrate, you won’t have refined sugar, but you’ll have plenty of other sugar.  If you’re going to buy a blueberry jam, I would rather it taste like fresh blueberries, not white grape juice or pear or apple  juice.  While too much refined sugar will mask the flavor of fresh blueberries, too much grape or apple or pear concentrate will mute the flavor of the fresh fruit you are working with and give you an entirely different product.

VanDien provided the following list of alternative sweeteners and comments on each one for Organica News.

LIST OF ALTERNATIVE SWEETENERS

Here are some of the sweeteners you may encounter in products:

Amasake: One of the least refined of the “natural” sugars, fermented and filtered, made from brown rice.

Barley malt: Mostly maltose. A dark, sweet, thick liquid. Sometimes used in malted milks.

Brown rice syrup: Cultured (usually naturally fermented) rice, broken down by enzymes, strained and cooked to a syrup-like consistency. Is also available in powder form.

Corn syrup: Cheap to produce, it’s basically glucose with water. Dark corn syrup has food coloring in it.

Date sugar: Made from pulverized (generally not refined) dates, it contains sucrose, glucose and fructose. It’s low in grams of sugar per teaspoon, low in calories.

Florida Crystals: A trademarked brand, slightly less refined than white refined sugar.

Fruit juice concentrate: “Reduced” (broken down) peaches, pears, pineapple, white grapes and other fruits are used. Concentrates can be highly refined. If a product has slightly refined or unrefined fruit juice, it will obviously be more nutrient dense.

Honey: A mix of sugars. Usually about 30-40% glucose, 40-60% fructose. Honey does contain some nutrients, but not many. It’s very high in calories. Honey may sometimes be “stretched” with additives, and some imported honeys are reportedly “contaminated.” It’s best to buy local honey.

Molasses: The dark brown syrup left after sugar processing has milled out and crystallized the sugar for refining. After filtering, molasses may have sulfur added to kill bacteria, and stabilize it. Blackstrap molasses contains iron and traces of vitamins and minerals.

Stevia: Made from the leaves of a Paraguayan herb, and usually found in powder form, it is 300 times sweeter than sugar. A little goes a very long way (obviously). It’s non-caloric, which is generally considered a plus. (See Stevia sidebar.)

Sucanat: A trademarked brand of “organic,” dehydrated sugarcane juice. Turbinado: Reportedly about 98% sugar (sucrose), only slightly less refined than white sugar, it’s generally tan in color. The British have a form of this sugar, called Demerara, which is a little darker.

Artificial Sweeteners:  The Atkins Diet Center has done research that indicates sweeteners that contain aspartame (such as NutraSweet and Equal) stimulate insulin production (leading to unstable blood sugar, irritability and carbohydrate cravings). Sweeteners that use sucralose (marketed as Splenda) and saccharin (such as Sweet’nLow) have not been shown to stimulate insulin production.

So, as with many debatable issues, the sugar debate is complex.   Sugar is a factor in dietary concerns, health issues, environmental concerns, and individual or cultural palates.  I try to develop my own products at HeathGlen’s Kitchen  with the freshest organic fruit available, the lowest sugar content I can attain, and the quickest cooking time to retain as many nutrients as possible.

Primarily however, I am looking to develop a lot of flavor and bring out the flavor of the particular fruit I am working with, unmasked by high levels of grape juice or sugar.  With high flavor, it does not take a lot of jam to satisfy, so you do not really need to use a lot to get the taste treat desired.

I leave it to the consumer to understand moderation, but I do believe that the labeling laws should force manufacturers to be more transparent.  Deceptive labeling can be harmful to the consumer with health issues.  The average consumer cannot realistically be expected to research out all of the literature on sugar and sugar alternatives.

Please comment with any knowledge or research you may have on the above issues.  I am a preserve-maker, not a scientist, nutritionist or health practitioner.  I do not profess to have the answers, just my beliefs….eat well, eat in moderation, enjoy and move your body.

Thanks……….Dorothy

 

Comments { 0 }

Waffle sandwiches: Bacon, Lime Marmalade & Goat Cheese; Cranberry Hot Pepper Jam & Brie; Bacon, Tomato Jam and Aged Cheddar

Cornbread Waffle Sandwich with Bacon, Lime Marmalade & Goat Cheese

Cornbread Waffle Sandwich with Bacon, Lime Marmalade & Goat Cheese

What do you do when your husband forgets to pay the gas bill, it’s the weekend, you want to make dinner, and have no stove?  Pull out the waffle iron!

I had been pondering ways to use the Lime Marmalade that we make for a while now.  I’ve used it in margaritas, with cornbread and chile and on English muffins, but it is so intense that it can be paired with some pretty robust flavors and still shine through.  These waffle sandwiches pictured above were a wonderful foil for the the marmalade: sweet (the jam), salty (bacon), cruncy (waffles) and creamy (goat cheese).  They even managed to distract me from freezing to death in a house with no heat.  If he hadn’t been working so hard on our taxes, I may have been inclined to have “expressed” my frustration.  As it turned out, however, all is well.

While I had the jams out I experimented with a few other flavor combinations in the waffle sandwiches.  They were all pretty good.  I may have to make this a staple for quick and easy dinners.  Here are two more:

Waffle Sandwich with Dried Cranberries, Cranberry Hot Pepper Jam & Goat Cheese

Waffle Sandwich with Dried Cranberries, Cranberry Hot Pepper Jam & Goat Cheese

Using Cranberry Hot Pepper Jelly:  I added some dried cranberries to the cornbread waffle batter for this one, softened the goat cheese just a bit in the microwave, and added the hot pepper cranberry jelly on top rather than inside.  It’s a toss-up on my favorite between this and the lime marmalade.  I really loved the cornbread crunch with the creamy fillings.

 

Waffle Sandwich with Tomato Ginger Jam, Bacon & Aged Cheddar

Waffle Sandwich with Tomato Ginger Jam, Bacon & Aged Cheddar

Using Tomato Ginger Jam:  This one was more savory, as the tomato jam is not as sweet as the jellies.  I used aged cheddar cheese here, and added the bacon to give it that classic flavor combination.  The tomato ginger jam definately added more of a twist, with a hint of sweetness coming through.  You could use any kind of cheese here with good results.

 

 

 

For the waffles themselves, I used a light & crisp waffle recipe from:  Pamela Anderson, Fine Cooking magazine (recipe below).  I substituted 1/2 c.  cornmeal for 1/2 cup flour, and added a handful of dried cranberries to the batter for the Cranberry Hot Pepper Jelly.

Once the waffles are crisp and golden brown, take them out and assemble.  I spread one waffle square with jam, placed cheese on another square and heated it for  10 seconds in the microwave.  Add warm bacon between and stack the two squares together.  Cut in half and you are done.  Easy and very delicious.

You can use any waffle recipe you wish.  I used Fine Cooking’s recipe because I had it handy and it looked good.  Here is their recipe:

Fine Cooking’s Light, Crisp Waffles:

1/4 c. all-purpose flour

1/2 c. cornmeal

1/4 c. cornstarch

1/2 tsp salt

1/2 tsp baking powder

1/4 tsp baking soda 3/4 c. buttermilk

1/4 c. milk

6 Tbs. vegetable oil

1 large egg, separated

1 Tbs. sugar

1/2 tsp vanilla

Mix the flour, cornstarch, salt, baking powder, and baking soda in a medim bowl.  Measure the buttermilk, milk, and vegetable oil in another bowl or Pyrex measuring cup; mix in the egg yolk and set aside.

In another bowl, beat the egg whilte almost to soft peaks.  Sprinkle in the sugar and continue to beat until the peaks are firma and glossy.  Beat in the vanilla.

Pour the buttermilk mixture into the dry ingredients and whisk until just mixed.  Drop the whipped egg white onto the batter in dollops and fold in with a spatula until just incorporated.

Pour the batter into the center of the hot waffle iron, let it spread out a bit and close.  Follow the directions on your waffle iron for how long to cook it.

 

Hope you enjoy these as much as we did (although it still would have been nice to have had gas and be in a warm house!).

 

 

 

Comments { 0 }

Top 7 (plus 1 maybe) Food Podcasts that I Listen to Without Fail

iron chef photo

Podcasts can help you dream of big things

When I first started farming I became enthralled with (and addicted to) farm auctions.  I brought home so much junk during that period of my life that my husband came close to starting a big, and secretive, bonfire.  Fortunately that phase ended and most of the stuff has been sold (or burned).

As the farm and the business grew, I became more and more interested in marketing.  I mean what good is it to have a great product, if no one really knows about it.  Working on a pretty tight budget, I decided the time was right to try and understand technology and the associated marketing avenues.   But where to start?  I didn’t grow up with technology and could barely text message.  After getting an ipod nano for a gift, my kids introduced me to itunes.  Holy Cow, what a gift that has been.  I discovered there were wonderful podcasts out there where truly knowledgeable, experienced people would teach you anything you desired…and for free!

I quickly became addicted and immersed myself in technology and business podcasts to try and learn about blogging and the technology and marketing world in general.  It was like going to college….for free!  I have learned so much about blogging, photography, marketing, and yes, food.  I was plugged in to my headphones constantly…during pilates, at Target, at home and in the car.  It was a little embarrassing actually, but when you’ve got an addictive personality, you get over embarrassing things pretty quickly.

So, after two years of this immersion into the podcast world, I have developed favorites in each subject.  Since this blog surrounds food, I thought I’d share my favorite food podcasts.  Maybe another day I can talk about the business podcasts.  Those were a godsend for the tech-neaderthal that I was.  I tell my kids I am now “tech-saavy”.  They don’t buy it, but they have to admit I have progressed.  Anyway, here are my favorite food podcasts.  They cover the range of food-related topics, from recipes, to history, to chef interviews, to science, to health.  Enjoy!  And get yourself a nano if you don’t have one.  They’re indestructible.

FAVORITE FOOD-THEMED PODCASTS:

Weekly Dish Podcast

Weekly Dish;  For me, this is the best information on what is happening in the local twin cities food scene.  The two Stephanies, one a food editor of the Minnesota Monthly magazine and one an avowed foodie and radio personality, are fun, knowledgeable and  full of inside information on local chefs, local restaurants, local farms, and markets. They also go beyond the chef interviews and interview the whole gambit of local food people, from butcher to baker to ….well I guess not candlestick makers yet.  Oh, and they give out great recipes.

 

Splendid Table with Lynne Rossetto Kasper

 

Splendid Table:  Want to spend a Saturday afternoon with a warm, experienced Italian chef and cookbook author that will answer your questions in depth and share her vast array of food knowledge in a way that makes you want to be her best friend?  I’m sure I don’t need to introduce Lynne Rossetto Kasper to you, but in case you miss any of her NPR radio shows…podcast it!  Lynne Rossetto Kasper is an icon in the food world and I feel so fortunate that she lives in Minnesota and I am able to talk with her at the St. Paul Farmers’ Market in the summers.

 

 

Stacy Pearl of Mouth of Wonder

Mouth of Wonder:  Stacy Pearl, originally from Brooklyn, New York,  has a diverse history as an artist, a caterer, a restauranteur, a private chef to the rich and famous and a radio host.  She now lives in Santa Fe New Mexico and her show gives me a feel of an area not necessarily known for it’s food and wine.  Her show is hilarious and she does a very good satire of herself as a New York Jewish socialite in a call-in segment called “ask Rula”.   She never fails to give out detailed recipes for food that will make your mouth water.  While very witty, funny and smart, Stacy Pearl doesn’t have that sharp edge that many expect from New Yorkers.  Her show is great fun and fun is a great way to learn in my mind.

 

 

KCRW Good Food:  This LA-based food-themed show is hosted by Evan Klieman.  Even though there is a live local farmer’s market report each week and local restaurants are reviewed, there is a lot of information that is much broader than California and keeps me up on current food trends.  I always learn something from this show, and it is interesting to hear about the plethora of fruit and vegetables that are available fresh in Southern California and how they are prepared.

 

KSRO Good Food Hour

KSRO Good Food Hour:  Another California-based show, this time from Sonoma County.  Chef John Ash and radio personality Steve Garner have been hosting this show together since 1987.  It is a very relaxed show and is focused on the “stories” of and by people in the food world.  Chef Ash and Steve Garner frequently  interview people at an outdoor festival or event and they have a really nice easy-going interview style.  Chef John Ash is an internationally recognized chef and while his humility is refreshing, his food knowledge and recipes garner respect right away.

 

Cooking Issues with Dave Arnold

Cooking Issues with Dave Arnold

Cooking Issues:  This is not a casual show for the home cook by any means, but it is certainly entertaining.  Dave Arnold, a technology and science wizard, is the host of this show, recorded in semi-shed behind a pizza place in Brooklyn, New York.  Arnold, who is a brother in law to Wylie Dufresne, is an edgy, smart, don’t-bore-me-with-anything-stupid-or-I-will-use-my-scathing-wit-to-bring-you-to-your-knees kind of guy.  I don’t understand half of the things he talks about, but there is always something fascinating that I have to listen to several times over with pen and paper in hand.  Arnold is the Director of Culinary Technology of The French Culinary Institute at The International Culinary Center and an award winning food writer.  This show is really designed for chefs and technique nerds, but I love it and wouldn’t miss it.

 

Food and Wine with Chef Jamie Gwen

Food and Wine with Chef Jamie Gwen

Food and Wine with Chef Jamie Gwen:  Chef Jamie Gwen is a highly articulate business-woman who is also an acclaimed chef and frequently co-hosts with Martha Stewart.  Because this show is 2 hours, Chef Jamie can delve into food and wine in more depth than some of  the others.  It is not the laid back ambiance of the other California shows, nor is it the sarcastic, edgy New York type of show.  This show is very polished and entertainment-industry focused, but there is a heck of a lot of food information and good recipes here.  There are many recipes for high-end dishes on this show, many of them from highly acclaimed chefs.  There are also a lot of interesting interviews with chefs on this show, and there is always a good segment on wine.

 

Taste Matters with Mitchell Davis

Taste Matters with Mitchell Davis

Taste Matters:  This is a fairly new show for me, but it promises to be quite different than the others.  The host is Mitchell Davis, Vice President of the James Beard Foundation, cookbook author, and restaurant reviewer.  Mr. Davis explores topics that center on “taste” rather than food.  Do women taste things differently than men for example.  He interviews some really interesting people and I am excited to learn about some of the  nuances of taste, as well as some of the social and psychological aspects of taste.  This show promises to examine personal tastes and collective tastes, biological tastes and acquired tastes, good tastes and bad tastes.  Sounds interesting to me.

 

Well there you have it.  I’m sure there are different “tastes” on what kind of food shows you like to listen to.  This collection of podcasts that I listen to gives me a breadth of personality and information that I can’t believe I can access so easily.  It’s kind of an amazing world we’re living in right now.  Enjoy!

Leave me a comment on some of your favorites if you listen to this kind of show.  I couldn’t get the top 10, only the top 9.  What should the 10th one be?

Cheers,

Dorothy

Comments { 0 }

Sharpening knives for the home cook: sharpening steel vs. manual sharpener

When a good cook finds a knife that works well with their own hands for their individual cooking purposes, it is a beautiful thing.  Those knives are cherished and cared for.  Never placed in the dishwasher and always kept sharp.  Or at least that is the goal.  Sharpening can be a bit elusive at times for the home cook.  These are my own favorite knives, and below I’ll share my personal findings on how best to sharpen the home cook’s knives.

My favorite Chef's knives


 Favorite Chef’s Knives:

a) the knife on the far left is a Cutco knife and the most expensive one I own.  It is very comfortable to hold and is a bit heavier than the Henckel.  The weight is nicer when cutting with the tip left on the board (i.e., for garlic). This is generally my “go-to” knife for most cooking tasks;

b) the Henckel is next to the Cutco and it is also really comfortable but quite a bit lighter.  I use this one when I’m chopping a large amount of produce and don’t want to wear out my wrist (i.e., for stir fry);

c) the knife on the far right is one that I purchased at a garage sale for $1.00 and I have come to love it for certain tasks.  It is a stainless steel Japanese knife called “Old Homestead” and it is great for cutting pizza, squash and anything larger or bulky.  The wood handle is not too comfortable, but the length and depth of the knife makes it great for the big cuts.

 


Boning Knife

Favorite Knife for Making Marmalades and Jams:

This is a boning knife that I have had for ages, but the size and style of this knife are just right for slicing citrus peels, taking pith off, and slicing small soft fruit.  It works far better for me than a paring knife or anything else I have tried.

 

 

Favorite Specialty Knife (actually this is a cleaver):

My pumpkin cleaver

 

I love this old cleaver that I picked up at a garage sale.  I always had trouble cutting through large winter squash and pumpkins for the fruit butters until I found this big guy.  I also just love the look of it, and the thoughts of its past history whenever I use it.  It makes me feel a little connected to some old Italian butcher with gnarly hands and chickens running around outside.

 

 

 

 

Sharpening Knives

With a Sharpening Steel:  I’ve always been a bit mystified at how quickly and efficiently chefs sharpen their knives with a sharpening steel.  I know the value of a consistently sharp knife in the kitchen, but knowing the correct angle and bevel for each particular knife and deftly achieving that angle with a sharpening steel, has always been a bit of an elusive holy grail for me.

My cooking/science guru Dave Arnold explained the process in a way that made sense in his 2/5/12 podcast at Cooking Issues.  He went into quite a bit of detail for sharpening Japanese Knives, Western knives and hybrid knives, and I thought I’d try the process for Western knives on my own knives.  The question is:  For the home cook, is this process really that much better than the very straightforward use of a good manual sharpener?

marking the manufacturer's bevel

 

Here’s a summary of my non-scientific test using information I gleaned from Dave Arnold’s podcast:

1) Mark the manufacturer’s bevel:  A traditional Western knife has an identical bevel on both sides.  This would be considered a 50/50 percentage bevel.  The trick is to get the angle right when using a steel.  First, mark the edge of the blade with a sharpie on both sides of the knife.

 

 

 

Sharpening with a Steel

2) Take the knife gently, but firmly across the steel/stone until you see that the sharpie marking is worn away flat and evenly down the blade.

 

3) When the sharpie is worn down evenly flat across the blade, you have achieved the same angle as the manufacturer had.

 

*Notes:  Dave Arnold explains that the bigger the angle, the less fragile the blade but the duller the knife is.  He notes that 17 degrees is common for newer knives and 30 degrees for older knives.

 

Chef's choice 450 Manual Sharpener

 

Sharpening Knives with a good manual sharpener:

While the use of the sharpening steel was much clearer to me now, I still wondered if it was that much better than just using a manual sharpener (for the home cook’s purposes anyway)?  Yes, it looks really cool to see chef’s expertly sharpening their knives, but was the benefit in sharpness worth the room for error?  I had done a little research over Christmas on finding the best manual sharpener, and ended up getting the chefs choice 450.

 

We used this manual sharpener on some of the knives and tried to compare.  This was a pretty simplistic and subjective comparison, but that’s what we are here at home…simple.


manual sharpening results

 

Results:

The Chef’s Choice 450 gave great results and was easier for the home cook to use with confidence.  I’m sure with practice, the sharpening steel is more accurate (and more fun), but for me the confidence that I was at least getting a similar and sharp angle on both sides, and the luxury of not having to think about it, was worth it.  I love my knives, and I love working with sharp knives, but for now I’ll just watch the chef’s sharpen their knives on TV and secretly sharpen my own with the manual sharpener.

Comments { 3 }
UA-22658354-1